Carbon Footprints

Jumbo Skip Hire – Helping to Reduce Carbon Footprints

Saving and conserving energy has been a major concern for people around the world for decades. Whether it’s gasoline to fuel our cars or electricity to heat our homes – energy is expensive in any form. Today, the term ‘carbon footprint’ has become a daily topic of conversation; however, there are still many individuals who don’t understand exactly what the term even means.
Energy can be created in many ways: We can burn fossil fuels such as coal and oil, or we can create energy from renewable sources such as solar power, harnessing the energy created by wind, hydroelectricity, nuclear fission, and even by capturing the power generated by the waves in the ocean. Renewable sources of energy differ from burning fossil fuels because when we burn fossil fuels, we unintentionally release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, creating a greenhouse effect that can eventually make our world uninhabitable.

carbon footprint
Carbon Footprints:

The atmosphere allows heat from the sun to warm our planet to a temperature that makes it inhabitable. It also prevents heat from the sun from escaping back into space. By burning fossil fuels, we are releasing too much carbon dioxide into the air, which traps additional heat and steadily increases the temperature of the entire planet. By reducing the amount of carbon dioxide we release into the air, we are reducing our carbon footprint.
For example, a home or business that uses a lot of energy created by fossil fuels has a large carbon footprint. Comforts such as lighting the home, running the washing machine, using the dishwasher, and cooling the area with AC systems uses a lot of energy and leaves a much larger carbon footprint than a home that uses solar power, low-energy light bulbs, and other energy saving methods.

recycle-carbon-footprint
Currently, several energy saving ideas are being proposed as a solution to the problem. Some scientists and researchers suggest that nuclear power is the answer, while many others disagree because of the radioactivity that it produces. Another option is harnessing wind energy, but these only produce power about 30 percent of the time.
As it is clear to see, determining which answer is best in reducing our carbon footprint can be difficult; however, all industries are being strongly encouraged to reduce the amount of energy used. In order to achieve this, individual industries must first determine how much carbon dioxide they produce in manufacturing each product.
To determine the amount of carbon dioxide produced, industry must take into account the amount of energy used at every stage of manufacturing from beginning to end. By adding up the amount of carbon emitted in the manufacturing, use, and disposal of our cosmetic product, a weight of carbon can be compared against other similar products produced by a variety of different manufacturers.

 
Presently, there is not enough data and information available for the cosmetics industry to make these determinations; it is also extremely expensive and time consuming to make theses determinations and most companies cannot afford to do so. In addition, the formal methods used to make these determinations are frequently in contrast of one another.
Another issue is that determining the size of a carbon footprint is only one small part of the overall picture. The danger here is that by focusing on only a single contributing factor, negative and harmful environmental effects can easily be transferred elsewhere and still cause significant damage.
Carbon Footprinting does have its uses, however, allowing companies to identify areas in the supply chain that emit the most greenhouse gasses so they can focus on areas where significant improvements can be made.

Life Cycle Thinking:

After considering all of the options available, it is suggested that life-cycle thinking is the best approach to the issue. Since carbon emissions are only a part of the overall problem, using a Life Cycle Thinking approach that considers social, economic and environmental sustainability appears to be the best approach.
The Life Cycle Thinking and Life Cycle Assessment are covered in greater detail in another section.